question
string | reference_answer
string | original_mutated_content
string | continuation_1_first_two_paras
string | final_intervened_trace_until_last_step
string | continuation_1
string | complete_answer_1
string | continuation_2
string | complete_answer_2
string | continuation_3
string | complete_answer_3
string | continuation_4
string | complete_answer_4
string | continuation_5
string | complete_answer_5
string | continuation_6
string | complete_answer_6
string | continuation_7
string | complete_answer_7
string | continuation_8
string | complete_answer_8
string | verifier_score_1
int64 | verifier_score_2
int64 | verifier_score_3
int64 | verifier_score_4
int64 | verifier_score_5
int64 | verifier_score_6
int64 | verifier_score_7
int64 | verifier_score_8
int64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "However, the question is about causation, not moral responsibility. The key is the causal link. \n\(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, if the question is purely about the causal chain regardless of intent, then maybe ye(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the answer is yes because the delay directly led to the neighbor taking the ki(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, if the question is purely about the causal chain regardless of intent, then maybe ye(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, the fact that the drunk driver is an intervening cause would mean that Joe's action (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, if the question is purely about the causal chain regardless of intent, then maybe ye(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, the problem might be expecting the answer to focus on the fact that the drunk driver(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, if the question is purely about the causal chain regardless of intent, then maybe ye(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the answer is yes because the sequence connects his action to the injury throu(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. So the problem is asking whether Joe caused his son's inju(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 0
| 1
| 0
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nRepresentatives(...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "یا maybe not? Let me think through the details again.\n\nFirst, the R&D said the program would do(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might be reading too much into it. Alternatively, maybe the program's environmental benefi(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But that's maybe overinterpreting. Alternatively, maybe the fact that the program was chosen becaus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "Or perhaps the program's design by R&D included both benefits, so by approving it for profit, they (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might be reading too much into it. Alternatively, maybe the program's primary goal was pro(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might be reading too much into it. Alternatively, maybe the program's environmental benefi(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might be reading too much into it. Alternatively, maybe the program's design by R&D was su(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "But that might be reading too much into it. Alternatively, maybe the program's design by R&D includ(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| "Or maybe the program's design inherently required that, so their choice to proceed was the cause of(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the board intentionally helped the environment when (...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED)
|
Yes
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that when Janet didn't put oil in, it's Kate's responsibility? Wait no(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "So the answer would be No, because Kate should have taken over the responsibility since Janet didn'(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "So the answer would be No, because Kate had the responsibility (even though her official role might(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "So the answer would be \"No,\" Janet's failure didn't cause the breakdown because Kate had the resp(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the idea is that since Kate was also capable, the responsibility was shared? B(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the logic is that since Janet was the one responsible, but Kate had the capabi(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "So the answer would be no. \n\nAlternatively, maybe the argument is that since Kate could have done(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "So the answer would be No, because Kate had the responsibility (even though her official role is HR(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "So the answer would be No, because Kate had the responsibility (even though her official role isn't(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 0
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom has a huge (...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "گراهی, but wait, Benni says he used B Y33R instead because he had some left. Oh right, so the (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. So the combination of b(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both chemicals were used. So the combin(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened where both were used. So the problem is that bo(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. So the combination of b(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. So the combination of A(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both were used. So the combination of b(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem says that the drying happened where both were used. So the problem's setup is(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem states that the drying happened where both chemicals were used. So the combin(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the fertilization by Alex caused the(...TRUNCATED)
| 0
| 0
| 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
| 0
| 0
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nDrew, Kylie, Ol(...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "گریزی? Wait, no. Wait, hold on. Wait, the problem says that \"only one person ordering coffee (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that might not be right. Since the profit is guaranteed with just one order, and the thre(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that's conflicting. Let me think again.\n\nThe problem states that \"the coffee shop will(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that's conflicting. Let me think again.\n\nThe problem states that the coffee shop makes (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but if the shop only needs one order, then even if all three regulars come, the profit is mad(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but if the shop only needs one order, then even if all four ordered, the profit is made, but (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but if the shop only needs one order, then the profit would have been made even if only one o(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but if the shop only needs one order, then even if all three regulars (Kylie, Oliver, Jen) or(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but that might not be right. Since the profit is made as long as at least one person orders. (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Drew ordering coffee on Tuesday caus(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJoe was about t(...TRUNCATED)
|
Yes
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "But the question is specifically asking if the drunk driver caused the injury. So even if Joe's act(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but maybe the question is more about whether the drunk driver's action was the actual cause. (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question might be getting at the idea of cause vs. proximate cause. Maybe the questio(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but maybe the question is more about whether the drunk driver's action was the actual cause. (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but maybe the question is more about whether the drunk driver's action was the actual cause. (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question might be getting at the underlying cause. The problem states that Joe's talk(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question might be getting at the underlying cause. The problem states that Joe's talk(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question might be getting at the underlying cause. The problem states that Joe's talk(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question might be getting at the underlying cause. The problem states that Joe's talk(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is whether the drunk driver caused injury to Joe's son. The options a(...TRUNCATED)
| 0
| 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
| 1
| 0
| 0
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nProf. Smith wor(...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "But hold on, no—because the IT approval was already there. The fact that both approved her doesn'(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "Because even without the budget committee's approval, she would have already gotten it through IT. (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "Because even without the budget committee's approval, she would have already gotten it through IT. (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the question is a bit trickier. Let me parse the exact wording again. The ques(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the question is a bit tricky here. Let me parse the exact question again: \"Do(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the question is trying to trick me. Let me parse the question again: \"Does th(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the question is trying to trick us. Let me parse the exact wording again. The (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "Because even without the budget committee's approval, she would have gotten it through IT. \n\nBut (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| "Alternatively, maybe the question is trying to trick us. Let me parse the question again: \"Does th(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to tackle this question. Hmm, so the problem is about causation between the departm(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nJanet is an emp(...TRUNCATED)
|
Yes
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "گراهششده maybe? Wait, but the problem states that Janet's responsibility is to put oil, and(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but Janet's inaction left the machine without oil, which is a necessary condition for the bre(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the question is specifically asking if Janet's not putting oil caused it. \n\nAlternative(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the oil was supposed to be Janet's responsibility. If Janet didn't do it, and Kate didn't(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but Janet's inaction created the situation where the oil was missing. However, since Kate had(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but Janet's failure to oil was the initial problem. However, since Kate could have done it bu(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the oil was supposed to be Janet's responsibility. If she didn't do it, and Kate didn't d(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but Janet's inaction meant that the oil wasn't there. However, if Kate was supposed to check (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, but the problem says that Kate didn't notice that Janet didn't put the oil. So if Kate had no(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether Janet not putting oil in the machine(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nTom works for a(...TRUNCATED)
|
Yes
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "ִילך Let me think again. \n\nWait, the key here is the conditions for the implosion. The implos(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no, wait. Wait a second. Wait, the problem says that the implosion happens if both the safety(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no—wait, wait. Wait, hold on. Let me check again.\n\nWait the problem says: \"the building (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no, wait a second. Wait, if the safety switch was already off at 4 PM, then if knob A had rem(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no. Wait, no—if the knob was off at 4 PM, then before Tom changed it, the two conditions (s(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no—if the knob was off at 4 PM, then if Tom hadn't turned it on, then at 5 PM, the two cond(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no—wait, no, because when the safety was off and knob A was on, that's the trigger. Wait, b(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no, wait a second. Wait, hold on. Wait the problem says \"the building will implode automatic(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no—wait a second. Wait, the problem says that the building would implode automatically at 5(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's try to figure this out. So the question is whether the building imploded because Tom ch(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
"How would a typical person answer each of the following questions about causation?\nIn a particular(...TRUNCATED)
|
No
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "But wait, the travel agency employees also arrived at 8:45, which they usually do. The key here is (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait no, because the travel agency employees did arrive at the usual time. Wait the problem says \"(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait no, because the travel agency employees were already there at 8:45. So the system would have t(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait no, because the travel agency employees did arrive at 8:45 as usual. So the system would have (...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait no, because the travel agency employees were already there at 8:45. Wait, the problem says \"t(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait no, because the travel agency employees did arrive at the same time. Wait, but if the system o(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait, no. Wait, the travel agency employees arrived at 8:45 as usual. So normally, the system would(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait no, because the travel agency employees were there at the same time. Wait the problem states t(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| "Wait no, because the travel agency employees did arrive at 8:45 as usual. So their arrival would ha(...TRUNCATED)
| "Okay, let's see. The question is about whether the design studio employees caused the climate contr(...TRUNCATED)
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
| 1
|
End of preview. Expand
in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 2